蓝田县妇联举行“贫困母亲两癌”救助款发放仪式

Not to be confused with Random coefficient model.

百度 从市场表现来看，上述10只受北上资金布局的个股在昨日普遍随市场回调，仅中信证券实现逆市上涨，涨幅为%，而海康威视、恒瑞医药、万科A、贵州茅台、双汇发展、水井坊等个股昨日均跑输上证指数，跌幅均超过%。

In econometrics, a random effects model, also called a variance components model, is a statistical model where the model effects are random variables. It is a kind of hierarchical linear model, which assumes that the data being analysed are drawn from a hierarchy of different populations whose differences relate to that hierarchy. A random effects model is a special case of a mixed model.

Contrast this to the biostatistics definitions, as biostatisticians use "fixed" and "random" effects to respectively refer to the population-average and subject-specific effects (and where the latter are generally assumed to be unknown, latent variables).

Qualitative description

Random effect models assist in controlling for unobserved heterogeneity when the heterogeneity is constant over time and not correlated with independent variables. This constant can be removed from longitudinal data through differencing, since taking a first difference will remove any time invariant components of the model.

Two common assumptions can be made about the individual specific effect: the random effects assumption and the fixed effects assumption. The random effects assumption is that the individual unobserved heterogeneity is uncorrelated with the independent variables. The fixed effect assumption is that the individual specific effect is correlated with the independent variables.

If the random effects assumption holds, the random effects estimator is more efficient than the fixed effects model.

Simple example

Suppose $m$ large elementary schools are chosen randomly from among thousands in a large country. Suppose also that $n$ pupils of the same age are chosen randomly at each selected school. Their scores on a standard aptitude test are ascertained. Let $Y_{ij}$ be the score of the $j$-th pupil at the $i$-th school.

A simple way to model this variable is

$Y_{ij}=\mu +U_{i}+W_{ij},\,$

where $\mu$ is the average test score for the entire population.

In this model $U_{i}$ is the school-specific random effect: it measures the difference between the average score at school $i$ and the average score in the entire country. The term $W_{ij}$ is the individual-specific random effect, i.e., it's the deviation of the $j$-th pupil's score from the average for the $i$-th school.

The model can be augmented by including additional explanatory variables, which would capture differences in scores among different groups. For example:

$Y_{ij}=\mu +\beta _{1}\mathrm {Sex} _{ij}+\beta _{2}\mathrm {ParentsEduc} _{ij}+U_{i}+W_{ij},\,$

where $\mathrm {Sex} _{ij}$ is a binary dummy variable and $\mathrm {ParentsEduc} _{ij}$records, say, the average education level of a child's parents. This is a mixed model, not a purely random effects model, as it introduces fixed-effects terms for Sex and Parents' Education.

Variance components

The variance of $Y_{ij}$ is the sum of the variances $\tau ^{2}$ and $\sigma ^{2}$ of $U_{i}$ and $W_{ij}$ respectively.

Let

${\overline {Y}}_{i\bullet }={\frac {1}{n}}\sum _{j=1}^{n}Y_{ij}$

be the average, not of all scores at the $i$-th school, but of those at the $i$-th school that are included in the random sample. Let

${\overline {Y}}_{\bullet \bullet }={\frac {1}{mn}}\sum _{i=1}^{m}\sum _{j=1}^{n}Y_{ij}$

be the grand average.

Let

$SSW=\sum _{i=1}^{m}\sum _{j=1}^{n}(Y_{ij}-{\overline {Y}}_{i\bullet })^{2}\,$

$SSB=n\sum _{i=1}^{m}({\overline {Y}}_{i\bullet }-{\overline {Y}}_{\bullet \bullet })^{2}\,$

be respectively the sum of squares due to differences within groups and the sum of squares due to difference between groups. Then it can be shown that

${\frac {1}{m(n-1)}}E(SSW)=\sigma ^{2}$

and

${\frac {1}{(m-1)n}}E(SSB)={\frac {\sigma ^{2}}{n}}+\tau ^{2}.$

These "expected mean squares" can be used as the basis for estimation of the "variance components" $\sigma ^{2}$ and $\tau ^{2}$.

The $\sigma ^{2}$ parameter is also called the intraclass correlation coefficient.

Marginal likelihood

For random effects models the marginal likelihoods are important.

Applications

Random effects models used in practice include the Bühlmann model of insurance contracts and the Fay-Herriot model used for small area estimation.

See also

• Bühlmann model
• Hierarchical linear modeling
• Fixed effects
• MINQUE
• Covariance estimation
• Conditional variance
• Panel analysis

Further reading

• Baltagi, Badi H. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (4th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley. pp. 17–22. ISBN 978-0-470-51886-1.
• Hsiao, Cheng (2003). Analysis of Panel Data (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 73–92. ISBN 0-521-52271-4.
• Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 257–265. ISBN 0-262-23219-7.
• Gomes, Dylan G.E. (20 January 2022). "Should I use fixed effects or random effects when I have fewer than five levels of a grouping factor in a mixed-effects model?". PeerJ. 10: e12794. doi:10.7717/peerj.12794. PMC 8784019. PMID 35116198.

External links

• Fixed and random effects models
• How to Conduct a Meta-Analysis: Fixed and Random Effect Models